Pfizer continuously and persistently claimed that their mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccine was shown to be effective for 95% of the cases, and powerful authorities around the world backed such claims. The reality, however, is that the relative risk ratio was used in this calculation, which cannot determine the effectiveness of a novel vaccine. Instead, the absolute risk ratio should be used, and after calculations performed by independent scientists, the effectiveness rate was determined to be at around 1 in 116, compared to the 95 in 100 result that was obtained following relative risk ratio calculations, which are much more subjective in nature. The absolute risk ratio calculations show how very little the vaccine can actually do to prevent transmission and the onset of the disease. This shows how corrupt health corporations and authorities have used pseudo-scientific approaches and big words to mislead people into trusting controversial medical acts. Unlike the relative risk ratio, which shows the effectiveness of a medical act only in a certain context, which is more theoretical in nature and which may often not be relevant to the big image at all. The absolute risk ratio, on the other hand, hints at a certain effectiveness rate based on examples that are often far more connected to reality.

The situation also exposes how people sometimes need to dive deeper into details to distinguish scientific facts from pseudo-science. And it is funny to observe how the corrupt have been using a mirror effect, so they would heavily attempt to bring their burden of guilt upon innocent people who just performed their own research prior to taking personal medical decisions.

Source of the featured image: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pfizer